Friday 31 January 2014

Assignment One ETAD 809

I wasn't sure if I should post this directly to the blog or add as an attachement... if that is even possible, so I will just copy and paste the completed work. I do have to state that being a teacher, I found it difficult to comment on the Evaluation without expressing my own thoughts and feelings about the program. This tended to be a challenge!

Assignment One:


I have chosen to discuss an evaluation of the full-day kindergarten programs in Ontario, located at http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/kindergarten/FDKReport2013.pdf. The evaluation looked at the impact  and benefits of early learning programs and their influence on childrens' academic future, and ways of improving the program.

I believe that the evaluation format was summaritive, as it looked at the effectiveness of a program and its ability to confirm the purpose that it had set out to achieve; early development of social and academic skills will improve success in a child's learning experience. This format also utilized data that was collected over a two year period, comparing results for  0 – 2 years attendance in the program. A variety of assessment tools were used to collect data, such as: surveys, observations, interviews with various participant involved in the study and student materials collected, all used to measure the level of success of the program. The evaluation not only looked at the impact of the program, but also looked at weaknesses found within the program, in order to make improvements.

I believe that the evaluation of this program presented many strengths during the assessment process.  The data was collected using several approaches such as in-person and telephone interviews, online surveys, focus group observations, classroom observations, teacher data collection, all to access information regarding measurement of child development. Several people were also involved in the process including parents, teachers, principals, early child development educators and community education partners, all with different expertise in early child development. 

The program also collected data using at a variety of measurements to indicate growth. These evaluations looked at the children’s' physical health and well-being, knowledge and communication skills, intelligence, maturity, their ability to socialize and their use of language. This allowed for a clearer representation of factors being identified, rather than focusing on only one aspect of academic growth.

The study also identified that it was essential to have the teachers and specialist in early childhood development work cooperatively throughout planning and executing of the full day program, the data collection process, and both attend professional development to ensure appropriate and effective training for the program. The data pointed out that in some situations, the teachers were the only partners who benefited from the professional training opportunities. This proved to be one of the weaknesses to the program.

Throughout the process, the evaluators recognized that there were weaknesses throughout the program. It became apparent that the roles and responsibilities of all the team members involved in implementing the program needed to be defined further in order to provide the best possible opportunities to ensure a successful program.  I agree with the findings that that when dealing with any early child development program, it is imperative that all members involved are equally committed to achieving absolute success, and need to be clear as to the expectations of their role. 

As a previous full-day kindergarten teacher, I find that this evaluation, for the most part, was done very well and their evidence showing that participation in the full-day kindergarten program benefits most children when it comes to increasing success in academics and social skills. I do, however, feel that “school readiness” for children also plays a factor in the program’s success and should be considered as part of the evaluation.  Children, who are at the low end of the age requirement, may not be ready for a full-day kindergarten, which could potentially negatively affect the outcome of the program. As well, children who have consistent parent involvement, including daily reading or letter recognition, also enter into a program with stronger academic skills.

 

Another consideration when evaluating any kindergarten programs success should be the involvement or completion of a preschool program prior to entering into a kindergarten program. From experience, in most cases, these children are recognizably more prepared for academic settings and have stronger social skills to start off the year.